Since 2004

International Working Group
on Alzheimer Disease

An independent, international consortium of clinician researchers dedicated to advancing the understanding, diagnosis, and prevention of Alzheimer disease.

IWG 2024 Framework → Educational Material
46 Clinical
Researchers

🧠 About the IWG

The International Working Group brings together the world's leading clinical experts on Alzheimer disease to develop and promote a rigorous, clinically grounded diagnostic framework.

The Birth

The International Working Group on Alzheimer Disease (IWG) was founded in 2004 by Professor Bruno Dubois, Director of the Institut de la Mémoire et de la Maladie d'Alzheimer (IM2A), Sorbonne Université, Paris, to address the growing need for internationally agreed diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer disease reflecting both the clinical and biological dimensions of the condition.

📜 A History of Landmark Criteria

The IWG has produced three generations of research criteria for Alzheimer disease: the IWG-1 criteria (2007), the IWG-2 criteria (2014), and the most recent IWG 2024 recommendations, published in JAMA Neurology. Each iteration has refined the clinical-biological definition of AD in light of new scientific evidence.

🌍 An International Consensus

The IWG unites 46 clinical neurologists, psychiatrists, neuropsychologists, and geriatricians from institutions across Europe, North America, Latin America, and Australia. This breadth of expertise ensures that the group's recommendations reflect diverse clinical practices and populations worldwide.

⚖️ An Independent and Responsible Voice

The IWG operates independently of pharmaceutical industry interests and regulatory bodies. Its recommendations are driven by patients' needs and scientific evidence. The IWG acknowledges the harms of over-diagnosis and premature labelling by advocating a specific patient journey for cognitively unimpaired individuals with positive biomarkers.

🎯 Clinical-Biological Framework

The IWG's defining position is that Alzheimer disease is a clinical-biological construct: a diagnosis requires both a recognised clinical phenotype (measurable cognitive impairment) and supportive biological evidence (positive AD biomarkers). Biomarker positivity alone, in the absence of symptoms, is not sufficient to support a diagnosis of AD.

📅 History of the Criteria

17 years of evolving science — from the revision of NINCDS–ADRDA to the 2024 clinical-biological construct. Hover over each milestone for a summary.

2007
IWG-1
Founding Criteria
Lancet Neurol.
First clinical-biological framework for AD. Diagnosis possible at the prodromal stage — before dementia — using hippocampal memory testing and supportive biomarkers.
2010
New Lexicon
Lancet Neurol.
Separates "Alzheimer's disease" (clinical entity) from "Alzheimer's pathology" (neuropathological process). Introduces asymptomatic at-risk and presymptomatic states.
2014
IWG-2
Major Revision
Lancet Neurol.
Reclassifies biomarkers (pathophysiological vs topographical). Formalises atypical AD forms. FCSRT validated as core memory test with ~92% specificity for prodromal AD.
2016
Preclinical AD
Review
Alzheimer's & Dem.
Comprehensive review of the preclinical stage. Most amyloid-positive cognitively normal individuals will not develop symptoms in their lifetime. Binary thresholds are arbitrary.
2021
Clinical Diagnosis
Recommendations
Lancet Neurol.
Direct response to NIA–AA 2018 biological criteria. Demonstrates low individual predictive accuracy of biomarkers alone. Asymptomatic individuals should be considered at-risk, not diagnosed with AD.
2024
IWG 2024
Current Framework
JAMA Neurol.
Updated lexicon with three tiers: Asymptomatic At-Risk, Presymptomatic AD, and Alzheimer Disease. Core 1 biomarkers alone insufficient. Vascular analogy endorsed over cancer model.

📄 Latest Publication

The IWG's most recent recommendations, published in JAMA Neurology in 2024.

2024 JAMA
Neurology

Alzheimer Disease as a Clinical-Biological Construct — An International Working Group Recommendation

JAMA Neurol. 2024 Dec 01; 81(12):1304–1311 · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.3770

In response to the 2024 Alzheimer Association criteria, which define AD as a purely biological entity, the IWG reaffirms that a diagnosis of Alzheimer disease requires both a recognised clinical phenotype and supportive biomarker evidence. The paper introduces a three-tier lexicon — At-Risk, Presymptomatic AD, and Alzheimer Disease — and provides four key recommendations for clinical practice, research, and public health.

Read the full framework on this site → View on JAMA Neurology →Original version of the paper — requires a journal account ⬇ Download NIHMS version →

🤝 Authors' Institutions

The IWG consortium brings together leading academic medical centres and research institutions across 4 continents.

AP-HP / Sorbonne UniversitéParis, France
UCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyLondon, United Kingdom
University of Geneva / HUGGeneva, Switzerland
UC San Diego — ADCSSan Diego, USA
Keck School of Medicine, USCLos Angeles, USA
Karolinska InstitutetStockholm, Sweden
University of Cologne / DZNECologne, Germany
UCLouvainBrussels, Belgium
Ace Alzheimer Center BarcelonaBarcelona, Spain
University of GothenburgGothenburg, Sweden
University of St AndrewsScotland, United Kingdom
Mayo ClinicRochester, USA
Harvard Medical School / MGHBoston, USA
National Institute on Aging (NIH)Bethesda, USA
Alzheimer EuropeLuxembourg
University of MelbourneMelbourne, Australia
Universidad de AntioquiaMedellín, Colombia
University of São PauloSão Paulo, Brazil

🔍 Explore the Website

Navigate the key sections of this site.